eQualityGiving logo Equality Giving

States of Equality Scorecard

Are you a second class citizen in your own state? Review state by state comparisons of the score on equality and gay rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Americans.

 

The score indicates the number of Equality Goals that have been reached in that state. Each "YES" gives 1 point. Half a point is given for partial achievement of an Equality Goal. One of the seven Equality Goals (repealing "Don't Ask Don't Tell") is mostly a federal level goal. Therefore, at the state level, the maximum score is 6. 

Click on any heading to sort table. Highest possible score is 6.0.

 STATE
 SCORE 
HATE CRIMES NON  DISCRIMINATION
 MARRIAGE
 GENDER
 YOUTH    PARENTING
 ALABAMA

2.0

FEDERAL  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO Some Jurisdictions

 ALASKA 

2.0 FEDERAL  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO  Some Jurisdictions
 ARIZONA
2.0
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO Not tested
 ARKANSAS
1.5 FEDERAL  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO  NO
 CALIFORNIA
5.5
YES YES Domestic
 Partnerships
YES YES YES
 COLORADO
3.5
YES YES Domestic Reciprocal Beneficiaries   Amended
 certificate
 NO  Second Parent Adoption
 CONNECTICUT
5.0
YES  Only sexual orientation YES YES  Only sexual orientation YES
 DELAWARE
3.0 FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  Only sexual orientation  NO YES  NO  Second Parent Adoption

 DISTRICT OF
 COLUMBIA

5.0
YES YES YES Amended
 certificate 
 Only sexual orientation YES
 FLORIDA
1.5
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO  NO
 GEORGIA
2.5
FEDERAL  NO  NO YES  NO  Not tested
 HAWAI'I
3.5 YES Only sexual orientation
Domestic Reciprocal Beneficiaries  YES  NO Some Jurisdictions
 IDAHO
1.5 FEDERAL  NO  NO  NO  NO Not tested 
 ILLINOIS 
4.0 FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) YES  NO YES  NO YES
 INDIANA
2.5
FEDERAL  NO  NO No gender in certificate  NO  Partial
 IOWA
5.5
YES YES YES YES YES Some Jurisdictions
 KANSAS
2.0
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  NO  NO  Amended
 certificate
 NO Not tested 
 KENTUCKY
2.0
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO Not tested 
 LOUISIANA
2.5 FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  NO  NO YES  NO Some Jurisdictions
 MAINE
4.0
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) YES  NO  Amended
 certificate
YES  Only Joint adoption 
 MARYLAND
4.0 YES  Only sexual orientation Recognizes
marriages
Amended
 certificate 
YES  Some Jurisdictions
 MASSACHUSETTS 
4.5
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  Only sexual orientation YES  Amended
 certificate
 Only sexual orientation YES
 MICHIGAN
2.5
FEDERAL  NO  NO YES  NO  Second Parent Adoption
 MINNESOTA
4.0
YES YES  NO Decided by Court order  YES Some Jurisdictions
 MISSISSIPPI 
1.5
FEDERAL  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO  NO
 MISSOURI
2.0
YES  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO Not tested
 MONTANA
2.0
FEDERAL  NO  NO Decided by Court order   NO Not tested
 NEBRASKA
2.0
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  NO  NO YES  NO  NO
 NEVADA
3.5
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  Only sexual orientation Domestic Partnerships YES  NO  Some Jurisdictions
 NEW HAMPSHIRE
3.5
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  Only sexual orientation
YES Amended
 certificate
 NO  Some Jurisdictions
 NEW JERSEY
5.5
YES YES Civil Unions
YES YES YES
 NEW MEXICO
3.0
YES YES  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO Some Jurisdictions
 NEW YORK
4.0
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  Only sexual orientation  Recognizes marriages YES  NO YES
 NORTH CAROLINA
2.5
FEDERAL  NO  NO YES  NO Not tested
 NORTH DAKOTA
2.0
FEDERAL  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO Not tested
 OHIO
1.5
FEDERAL  NO  NO  NO  NO  Not tested Joint Adoption
 OKLAHOMA
2.5
FEDERAL  NO  NO YES  NO  Not tested
 OREGON
4.0 YES YES Domestic Partnerships Amended
 certificate
 NO YES
 PENNSYLVANIA
2.0
YES  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO Second Parent Adoption 
 RHODE ISLAND
3.0 FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) YES  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO Some Jurisdictions
 SOUTH CAROLINA
2.0 FEDERAL  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO Not tested
 SOUTH DAKOTA
2.5
FEDERAL  NO  NO YES  NO Not tested
 TENNESSEE
1.5
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  NO  NO  NO  NO Not tested
 TEXAS
2.5
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  NO  NO  Depends on Clerk  NO Some Jurisdictions
 UTAH
2.0
FEDERAL  NO  NO YES  NO  NO
 VERMONT
5.5
YES YES YES Amended
 certificate
YES YES
 VIRGINIA
2.5
FEDERAL  NO  NO YES  NO Not tested
 WASHINGTON
4.0
YES YES Domestic Partnerships
Amended
 certificate
Only sexual orientation Some Jurisdictions
 WEST VIRGINIA
2.0 FEDERAL  NO  NO Amended
 certificate
 NO  Not tested
 WISCONSIN
3.0 FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation)  Only sexual orientation  NO Decided by Court order Only sexual orientation
 Not fully tested
 WYOMING 2.0 FEDERAL  NO  NO  Amended
 certificate
 NO  Not tested

 

NOTES

  • Each column refers to an Equality Goal. Check here for more information on them.
      
  • The Gender column refers specifically to the freedom of choosing your own gender. As such it focuses of the laws of different states regarding birth certificates. Other gender identity issues are addressed in the proper column. For instance, in Hate Crimes and Employment a state can only get a full score if they include gender identity.
      
  • The Youth column focuses on whether the state has non-bullying statues that specifically enumerate sexual orientation and gender identity. If a state has non-bullying statues that do not enumerate sexual orientation and/or gender identity, we do not give any credit, because according to GLSEN's research, "these statutes provide no more benefit to LGBT students than not having any law at all." There 27 such states without enumeration: Alabama (which uses the term harassment instead of bullying), Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming. Furthermore, some states provide policies through the Department of Education; GLSEN is investigating the effectiveness of these policies vs. state statues; after the results of this research are known,  we will give credit to a state as appropriate.


ANALYSIS (50 states + District of Columbia):

  • No state provides full equality to the LGBTQ population (i.e., a score of 6).
     
  • Four states: California, Iowa, New Jersey, and Vermont, achieve a rating of 5.5 out of 6. California and New Jersey can achieve the perfect score of 6 by converting civil unions (New Jersey) or domestic partnerships (California) to civil marriage. Iowa can reach a score of 6 by ensuring full parenting rights in all cases. Vermont can achieve a score of 6 by protecting the transgender population more (in particular: do not show "amended" birth certificates when changing gender).
  • One other state (Connecticut) and the District of Columbia scores 5 out 6.
  • Massachusetts scores only 4.5 despite that if offers marriage equality. This is because it falls short in transgender protections in hate crimes, non discrimination, anti-bullying, and providing new birth certificates. (With the enactment of the Federal Hate Crimes Act, Massachusetts rating increased from 4.0 to 4.5 as the state legislation only offered hate crimes protections based on sexual orientation only.)
     
  • Passing federal legislation on an Equality Goal would increase every state score by 1.

 

THE IMPACT OF FEDERAL HATE CRIMES LEGISLATION

The signing of the federal Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act by President Obama on October 28, 2009 marked the achievement of our first Equality Goal.

Equality-Gay-Rights-State-by-State.jpgThe chart to the right shows the rating of states from zero to the maximum of 6 before the enactment of the federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act.

Fifty percent of the states satisfied none or just one of the 6Equality Goals that are required to ensure that LGBTQ people have thesame legal protections as everyone else.

Prior to this federal legislation out of 50 states plus the District of Columbia:

  • 19 states did not have legislation protecting against hate crimes based on sexual orientation or gender identity/expression
  • 17 states had only hate crimes protections based on sexual orientation
  • 14 states and the District of Columbia had had hate crimes protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression

After the enactment of this federal legislation all states and the District of Columbia are covered by the Hate Prevention Act based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression.

Equality-Gay-Rights-State-by-State-after-Federal-Hate-Crimes.jpgNote that the number of states with a score of 5 has not changed (there are only five such states: California, Iowa, New Jersey and Vermont with a score of 5.5 and Connecticut with 5.0). All of these states already offered already hate crimes protection for sexual orientation and gender identity/expression.

Because of passing the federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act, the number of states with very few protections for LGBT people has improved. Before the Act, fifty percent of the states satisfied none or only one of the Equality Goals; now all states satisfy at least one goal, but ten percent of the states provided little more (they are: Arkansas, Idaho, Mississippi, Ohio, and Tennessee).

 

Check our LGBT directory of organizations working to achieve equality. Each organization is represented by a major donor explaining why he or she is so committed to the organization.

 

RESULTS FROM THE QUIZ

Equal and Gay Quiz ResultsThe people who took the Equal and Gay Quiz, as a group had a tendency to underestimate the actual score in their state by about 1 point out of 6 as the chart indicates.

So, the good news is that most states offer slightly more equality than the average person who took the test estimated. The bad news is that the state of equality in the United States is unacceptable with half of the states offering none or 1 of the six equal protections that all other citizens enjoy.

 

RECENT HISTORY

  • On October 28, 2009 President Obama signed into law the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
  • On November 4, 2008 voters placed a constitutional ban on marriages in Arizona, California, and Florida. Arizona and Florida already had laws prohibiting same-sex marriages. But, in California same-sex couples had a constitutional right to marry; this right was taken away by voters.
  • On October 10, 2008 the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that the civil unions that the legislature approved for the state violated the Connecticut constitution and the state had to provide marriage to same-sex couples. But the federal government still does not recognize those marriages and does not allow to serve openly in the military. On November 4, 2008 voters rejected a call to have a Constitutional Convention in Connecticut. Therefore, the right to marry is secure in Connecticut (like in Massachusetts).
  • On May 15, 2008 the California Supreme Court approved marriage equality for same sex couples. California become the first state to offer full equality to the LGBTQ population. There is a ballot initiative on November 2008 to try to overturn this ruling. Everybody's support is critical.
  • In May 2008, the Florida legislature passed anti-bullying legislation (but it does not enumerate protected clasees)
  • In May 2008, Maryland become the 7th state with anti-bullying legislation that specifically protects youth because of their sexual orientation and gender identity/expression

 

 
eQuality alerts

Keep up to date on how to reach legal equality faster by signing for our eQuality alerts (no spam!). Even better, register to have access to confidential information on this website (benefits of registration). Registration is free and your information is not given to anyone.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER NOW AND BE PART OF THIS ONLINE COMMUNITY 

 

 

CLICK to email this page to your list

POST AND PARTICIPATE [how to post]

Click to Post
From eQualityGiving - Mar. 8, 2010 4:58 AM

Thanks, Aaron.

We have updated that Colorado has Domestic Reciprocal Beneficiaries.


From Aaron [99.96.95.10] - Mar. 5, 2010 8:29 PM

Slight correction...

Colorado has Domestic Reciprocal Beneficiaries almost identical to Hawaii's.


From Stefan [131.111.185.87] - Mar. 3, 2010 7:15 PM

Very interesting to see how varied the American states are. Britain (where I live) would probably get 5.5, as we have 'civil partnership' which is marriage in all but name. What's amazing is that it's all happened in the past 10 years!


From eQualityGiving - Dec. 3, 2009 9:21 PM

In response to Kem's comment: New York state, as pointed out in the scorecard does not cover gender identity in the state's laws that cover sexual orientation in hate crimes and employment discrimination.  

In the Gender column, the focus is the freedom of gender and the ability to change your gender. The main item that we look at is the birth certificate. Granted, most people go through life without looking at the birth certificate. But this is an important document in order to change other documents that are critical for day-to-day life. States treat birth certificates in three ways, which are representative of their understanding of the freedom of gender: (1) they provide a new certificate with the correct gender and name, without any indication about the prior gender or name, (2) they provide an amended certificate, which clearly indicates that changes were made, or (3) they refuse to change the birth certificate. Check the Freedom of Gender equality goal for more details. New York State falls in the first category; hence, it is given credit in the gender column.


From Kem [208.120.132.6] - Dec. 2, 2009 11:12 PM

CORRECTION

I have to echo earlier comments.  Why is NY green for 'Gender'?  It most certainly should not be.


From T-Zero [72.251.38.60] - Oct. 28, 2008 8:03 AM

Query. Doesn't Colorado allow all adults to adopt, not restricted to only gay second parent adoptions?


From T-Zero [72.251.34.26] - May. 14, 2008 7:00 PM

CORRECTION

I was in error about the Florida anti-bullying bill.

Sen. M. Mandy Dawson, D-Fort Lauderdale, had filed an amendment on the Senate floor that would have required anti-bullying policies to prohibit such behavior against specific categories of students. Those would have included sexual orientation, disability, ethnicity, gender identity or expression, and national origin.

But after receiving indications that some senators might be unwilling to vote for the bill with that amendment, Dawson withdrew the amendment.

The bill that passed made no enumerations or protected categories.


From T-Zero [72.251.34.26] - May. 14, 2008 2:36 PM

Reply to Pia re: scores

According to my count: California 5.5, New Jersey 5.0, Vermont 5.0


From T-Zero [72.251.34.26] - May. 14, 2008 2:23 PM

Suggested Scorecard Updates

  • 5 May 2008: Florida Senate passed anti-bullying bill including sexual orientation and gender.  (reported by Andy Humm in Gay City News)
  • 14 May 2008: Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley signed anti-bullying bill including sexual orientation and gender.


From Someone in Georgia [74.244.33.108] - Apr. 22, 2008 4:20 PM

Also, there are definitely counties in Georgia where second-parent adoptions are routinely approved.


From Someone in Georgia [74.244.33.108] - Apr. 22, 2008 4:15 PM

I can't speak for other matters, but your chart is definitely in error with regard to birth certificates in Georgia.

After my surgery, my shiny new birth certificate was issued with the correct sex and name on it, and absolutely no indication that it has ever been changed.  The original birth certificate was sealed, and that information can now only be accessed with an explicit court order.

It only took me about an hour at the Dept of Vital Records to get my new birth certificate, too.  No legal petitions or judges or anything.  Just a letter from my surgeon, and about $10 for a new certificate.

Also, Illinois will only update your birth certificate if your surgeon is licensed in the USA, so I know of lots of women that went to Thailand who can't update theirs.  I'd downgrade them significantly for that, personally.


From eQualityGiving - Apr. 19, 2008 11:03 PM

Vermont was upgraded from 4.5 to 5. So now there are indeed three states with a score of 5 or 5.5. Still no state has a perfect 6.


From Pia [166.165.163.233] - Apr. 19, 2008 7:34 PM

"Only two states (California and New Jersey) achieve 5 of the 6 Equality Goals."

Didn't Vermont score a five also?


From joey [63.238.156.230] - Apr. 19, 2008 8:50 AM

thank you for taking the time to explain. for whatever reason i just didn't notice the EQUALITY GOALS column on the left until now. doh! sorry about that ... keep up the great work guys!


From Arkansas Traveler 317 - Apr. 19, 2008 8:21 AM

Please give Arkansas a tenth of a point raise in ranking, just for the encouragement. Eureka Springs is the ONLY municipality in the state to have a DPR, enacted by unanimous vote of the city council May 14, 2007. With no residency requirement, the DPR has attracted straight and gay couples from 10 other states and 35 cities within Arkansas. Largely symbolic, because it confers no rights/benefits (prohibited by state consitution, unfortunately), it may be recognized by some employers and insurance companies as proof of relationship. Plus, it has deep personal meaning for couples who cannot or choose not to marry. Sexual orientation is also included as a protected class in the city's hiring policy.

All of which is a far cry from equality. But for a resort town of 2300 smack in the Bible Belt, it's a start.  For more information, see the DPR link and news stories on www.gaynewsbureau.com


From eQualityGiving - Apr. 18, 2008 5:51 PM

Answering Joey's question: In Gender, the focus is the freedom of gender and the ability to change your gender. The main item that we look at is the birth certificate. Granted, most people go through life without looking at the birth certificate. But this is an important document in order to change other documents that are critical for day-to-day life. States treat birth certificates in three ways, which are representative of their understanding of the freedom of gender: (1) they provide a new certificate with the correct gender and name, without any indication about the prior gender or name, (2) they provide an amended certificate, which clearly indicates that changes were made, or (3) they refuse to change the birth certificate. Check the Freedom of Gender equality goal for more details.

In the youth column we look at anti-bullying/safe schools legislation. Some states do not have such legislation and others only cover sexual orientation. We look for legislation that clearly enumerates the categories covered instead of blanket statements. Check the Protect Youth equality goal for more details.

 


From joey [63.238.156.230] - Apr. 18, 2008 4:45 PM

what are the categories "gender" and "youth" refering to?


From Nicole [20.137.2.50] - Apr. 18, 2008 7:55 AM

As a transwoman living in NY state, I can assure you that I have no legal protection state wide. There are localities that protect gender expression, but state wide protection is definitely lacking. There are currently efforts to pass GENDA, a law that would extend protection to trans people, but even bringing that to the floor is difficult.

That being the case, I don't understand why the gender box is green for New York.


Site

Search
Index

User

Login
Register

 
 

Last Modified 2010-03-08